Crimes and Misdemeanors () - Crimes and Misdemeanors () - User Reviews - IMDb
Describing his intentions in Crimes and Misdemeanors Woody Allen tells and though he is trying to end the relationship, she is threatening to. SYNOPSIS: Woody Allen's “Crimes and Misdemeanors” intertwines two stories. Cliff, a nerdy and unsuccessful documentary filmmaker, who is in an unhappy marriage. Judah and Cliff meet up at the end of the film, and Judah presents an . The principal characters in ''Crimes and Misdemeanors,'' Mr. Allen's most straight and, at the beginning, it is not easy sorting out the relationships. fine penultimate scene, sets up the coda that is the bittersweet final image.
Alan Alda plays Cliff's other brother-in-law and nemesis, Lester, a thoroughly obnoxious but prominent writer and producer of TV sitcoms. The antagonism between these two characters is sharpened when Lester, as a favor to his sister, hires Cliff to shoot a TV documentary about Lester himself for a "Creative Minds" PBS-style series. Since Cliff is married and Lester is an obvious philanderer, this romantic triangle forms the "misdemeanor" segment of the film's plot - adultery and licentiousness having long been stricken from the contemporary urban world's list of cardinal sins.
Cliff's work on the Lester documentary allows Allen to satirize the TV-centered culture that lionizes a figure like Lester but offers scant recognition or reward to the subject of his documentary work-in-progress, Professor Levy or, by extension, to Cliff himself.
Although he has some moments, Lester is an easily deflated buffoon - a self-satisfied font of reductive and repeated bombast "if it bends it's funny; if it breaks it's not funny. In "real life" Lester not only has the power to keep filling the airwaves with pap, but to fire Cliff and - most depressingly - to seduce and marry his dream girl, Halley. If Judah finds the absence of moral order comforting, Cliff is totally nonplussed by reality's harsh artlessness, but then, as Judah advises him: Despite the literal place of darkness he has entered, the rabbi embodies the affirmative element in Professor Levy's vision, eloquently expressed in these words: It is only we, with our capacity to love that give meaning to the indifferent universe.
And yet, most human beings seem to have the ability to keep trying and even try to find joy from simple things, like their family, their work, and from the hope that future generations might understand more. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. If you want a happy ending, you should go see a Hollywood movie. It is urban and sophisticated, subtle and cruel. It is darker than dark and self-ironic. It is profound and touchingly poignant. It is deadly serious and in the same time it is incredibly funny.
Its humor is razor sharp and sparkling and the best and funniest Woody's one-liners and comic performances belong here.
As always in his best films, Allen had created a clever and elegant film out of his own weaknesses and insecurities and it shines. How much was Allen able to meditate on life, death, God, religion, morality, crimes and the responsibility, love and lust, happiness and the price one pays for it, and among those eternal subjects - how much fun it is to skip work or school and to sneak to the movies.
It has the references to many Artists and cultures - Chekhov, Dostoyevsky, and Bergman among the others but it is so undeniably and uniquely Allen. It could not have been made by any other director. But even the pooping has a purpose in the film I believe. The movie discusses whether there are certain actions that are always right or wrong. For instance, wouldn't it be better for Judah to have his girlfriend murdered rather than for the truth to be left out in the open.
The film is scary in that, as I was watching I found myself thinking "Well, yeah, you've got to kill her Judah, it's the best way to go.
This was an excellent film that has caused me to seek out other Woody Allen films. One is allowed to explore much of what is ethical. The film has normative features and also allows the viewer to consider metaethical matters as well. The film's success in portraying normative matters in ethics is evident by examining the murder of Delores and Judah's moral responsibility or lack thereof.
Near the end of the film, the viewer realizes that Judah has adopted an egoist stance on matters of ethics after one learns that his conscience is free of guilt and his life has prospered after having Delores murdered. Possibly, Judah has assumed, if there exists some moral deciding agent apart from himself, then he would not have been rewarded with prosperous years and would have recieved punishment.
In the midst of considering normative matters of ethics, one is also making metaethical assumptions in the course of examining this film.
One may also consider, as Judah did, whether matters of ethics are objective independent of the actor or subjective dependent of the actor. Judah assumed or concluded in his egoist interpretation that matters of ethics are dependent on himself rather than some other authority like God or one's society. Overall, this film was enjoyable to watch and further contributed to my understanding matters of ethics.
The other character, Judah, works as an eye specialist. If there were anything that I would change about the film, I would have had Lester assassinated by the mob. I can honestly say that I saw a good movie that was made by Woody Allen. It would surprise me if they were created by Woody, himself. I really enjoyed the scene at the dinner table, where Judah envisions his family having a discussion about sin.
I personally liked the film and would recommend it to anyone who likes a good film. His father, on the other side of the argument, says that you should never bend the rules. He thinks that a person should lead a good life, even if heaven and hell are not legitimate, because he believes people live a fuller life when they are good. The husband eventually goes through with his plan to murder his mistress through a connection his brother has.
After it is over, he goes to the apartment where her dead body lay, and he immediately felt remorse. He eventually agrees with his flashback radical aunt, because as time goes by he feels less and less remorse for what he had done, so he feels the set of rules his aunt went by in the flashback seem to be correct.
It follows the struggles of two people in two different ways. He lives in a way that shows respect and dignity for most other people. Yet, throughout the movie he is continually crapped upon. He comes to fall in love with a relatively nice woman who proceeds to deny his advances.
His job is his passion, yet he makes almost no money from it. He takes a job working for his douchey brother-in-law, who makes much more than he does, and, at the end, the woman he falls for ends up with this prick.
Judah, on the other hand, is not necessarily nefarious to start out with, but over the course of the movie we come to learn that any moral code he had quickly takes a back seat to his own selfish motives. Whether that is to eventually decide to authorize the murder of a woman to avoid the scandal of an affair and the ruin of his professional life, to, in the end, coming to terms with this heinous act that has plagued him for so long just so he can sleep at night.
These two different storylines, to me, portray the absurdity of the existentialist point of view better than most movies. This movie took me for a spin on how far someone will go just to actually save their own skin.
Judah started off as a pretty decent character until Dolores decided that she wanted more and was going to tell if she didn't get what she wanted. It was a turn of events when the subject of murdering her came up. While I can understand that he didn't want anybody to find out about his affair, I thought that this was pretty extreme way of keeping someone from telling a secret.
Clifford really was sad to the point because it was a similar situation in the fact of dealing with adulterous affairs. He never ceased to amaze me on how much he showed contempt for Lester. He really doesn't like the fact that Lester is trying to get with the girl that he's interested in. It is amazing to see that after so many times of Clifford warning her of Lester that she still ends up getting with him because she thinks he's changed.
At first, she was so persistent on not dating him because she knew how he was with women. It was a really shock for me, and of course Clifford, for her to hook up Lester.
I think it was incredibly harsh on her treatment of Clifford when he showed interest and she said she wasn't wanting to date anybody. This was a movie with many different situations happening all at one time. It was a task to keep up, but it made the movie far more interesting to watch and keep up with the storyline.Crimes and Misdemeanours - Prof Levy committed suicide
Crimes and Misdemeanors was a very long movie. At the beginning of the movie I was interested, but after a while, I was about to fall asleep. I do however like the overall plot and theme. The characters in the movie were interesting as well. The main character Judah was the typical male figure. He thought it was ok to have the wife with the mistress on the side.
Crimes and Misdemeanors - Wikipedia
Once the mistress said she was going to talk to his wife, his life spiraled out of control. He was focused on getting her out of the picture and continuing to live his life with his wife. The filmmaker Cliff has many problems with his relationship. He and his wife are not seeing eye to eye, and eventually he starts to build an emotional connection with his co-worker.
He then starts to dislike his wife and her family less and less, and that leads to his demise. Once he finds out about the engagement of the assistant and Lester, he realizes that he has no one left to love and he is left all alone.
Both of the characters Judah and Cliff are suffering with choices of morality. Judah has to deal with the guilt of murdering his mistress, and Cliff has issues with his wife and their failing marriage.
Neither of the two can openly chose the right thing to do. Crimes and Misdemeanors is one of my new favorite movies. It was only the second Woody Allen movie I had ever seen. I love his dry wit and self-deprecating humor.
His interpretation of morality was pretty interesting; once Dolores was killed, Jack basically said that no one would ever find out so there was no need to worry or feel any negative emotions. He sounded much more logical to me than Judah ever did. I wanted him to end up with Hailey and her choice to be with Lester completely changed my view of her. Both Cliff and Judah got involved with other women when they were still married.
I enjoyed how Cliff and Judah were separate from one another until the very end. I did not exactly understand the role of Professor Levy or his suicide. I am sure he had a specific purpose in the film but I am not sure what that is.
This Woody Allen film discusses the philosophical issues of morality and existentialism by entering the life of Judah Rosenthal, an ophthalmologist in New York City. Judah begins revisiting his religious upbringing once his conscience is filled with guilt after having his discontented mistress murdered. Once Judah realizes that he will go unpunished because of his social status and connections, his conscience launches him into a philosophical dilemma, in which he must question his faith and morality.
When speaking to Judah, Rabbi Ben highlights the two opposing religious philosophies presented in the movie: This view contrasts greatly with the not only physically but also metaphorically blind Rabbi Ben, whom director Woody Allen commented on saying: Once Judah realizes that he will continue living his comfortable life unscathed, his situation becomes an example of moral relativism in that there are no universal moral truths.
A flashback Judah experiences in the film presents the two opposing moral philosophies he contemplates.
He imagines coming upon his family during a Passover dinner during his childhood, and he asks what the consequence would be if a man killed. Then his aunt said: It is an incredibly witty film. Woody Allen does not disappoint with this movie.
This is a very philosophic and thought-provoking dealing with truth and responsibility.